One fun to thing to do after a draft is compare the draft spot with which you got your player to their spot on your draftsheet. For example, Randy Moss is ranked 9th on our Top 200 list but I got him with the 10th overall spot, getting a value of +1. Not exactly a steal, but it was the right pick for me. Here are two recent money league drafts I did.
Draft #1
1) Frank Gore (Overall Pick #3) Value: -1
2) Steven Jackson (22) Value: +15
3) Miles Austin (27) Value: +10
4) Jonathan Stewart (46) Value: +9
5) Knowshon Moreno (51) Value: +18
6) Wes Welker (70) Value: +30
7) Mike Sims-Walker (75) Value: +22
8) Jay Cutler (94) Value: +31
9) Johnny Knox (99) Value: +30
10) Montario Hardesty (118) Shit.
11) Bernard Berrian (123) Value: +16
12) Zach Miller (142) Value: +38
13) Chris Cooley (147) Value: +52
14) Jacoby Jones (166) Value: +41
15) Minnesota (171)
Draft #2
1) Randy Moss (10) Value: +1
2) Aaron Rodgers (15) Value: +5
3) Greg Jennings (34) Value: +3
4) Jonathan Stewart (39) Value: +2
5) Felix Jones (58) Value: -2
6) Marion Barber (63) Value: -1
7) Brandon Jacobs (82) Value: +20
8) Johnny Knox (87) Value: +18
9) Darren McFadden (106) Value: +25
10) Terrell Owens (111) Value: +36
11) Chris Cooley (130) Value: +35
12) Ben Roethlisberger (135) Value: +32
13) Jacoby Jones (154) Value: +29
14) San Diego (159)
15) Neil Rackers (178)
When it’s a toss-up between an RB and a WR in the early rounds, I generally try to go with the RB because of all the sleeper WRs later. ESPN’s Matthew Berry is advocating the exact opposite strategy this year – make sure to get 2 elite receivers and then clean up on all the committee RBs and hope that a few work out. I think in reality, it depends on your draft pick. If you get an early pick, then you’ll certainly get an elite RB early because the top 6 or 7 consensus picks are RBs. And by the time it wraps around to the late 2nd round, the top WRs and QBs (Johnson, Moss, Brees, and Rodgers) are invariably gone, so you can grab another solid RB.
Thus, with my #3 pick in the first draft, I put together a solid RB group, and then used a quantity over quality approach with the WRs. When a true value pick like Jacoby Jones falls to you in the end, I advocate not picking up a Kicker. After the draft, I thought, “Who can I possibly drop to get a kicker?” Things worked themselves out when Hardesty landed on I.R., so I dropped him and picked up my favorite Kicker, Neil Rackers.
In the 2nd draft, I ended up using Berry’s strategy with my later pick and it worked out ok. It’s a little disconcerting that all of my RBs are in a committee situation. As opposed to the first draft in which every pick had a positive value, I had to start reaching for the best available RBs in the 5th round of the 2nd draft. The team ended up quite balanced: 5 RBs, 5 WRs, 2 QBs, 1 TE, K, and Def. I don’t plan on starting Big Ben over A-Rod any week except A-Rod’s bye, but the value was so good at that point that I couldn’t pass him up. As soon as someone’s QB situation gets bad next month, I’ll be sitting on primo trade-bait.
You’ll notice some overlap in the drafts, with the guys I’ve been touting all summer. I think the takeaway is that if you have any say in your draft pick, go for a top 5 pick. I’m finding a lot more value in late round WRs. So you can get elite RBs and even 1 elite QB and TE, and then load up on T.O., Jacoby Jones, Laurent Robinson, and/or Malcolm Floyd.
What do you think of these teams? Comment below.
10 comments:
The first team looks WAY better. What a studly rb core
In your second draft it looked like you panicked too much with your rbs, taking five committee rbs in six rounds seems like you passed on a lot of value at other positions. Do you advise drafting like that? I would feel really uncomfortable with any of those rbs week one
@The Truth: Ouch, the truth hurts. Yes, you're right that I was panicking a little in round 4. But in terms of passing up better value players at that point, I would have REALLY been in trouble if I kept taking guys like Michael Crabtree and Hines Ward in those rounds because then I would have NO RBs. The point of the draft comparison is that IF it's important to you to start workhorse RBs and not mix and match committee guys all season, you need to get the RBs early, and hope for a top 6 draft spot because that makes it much easier.
I would probably want another QB to backup Cutler just in case
That is one SASSY pic of steven jackson. haha
I like how in the first draft, since you missed the top 7 elite TEs, you grabbed 2. you can play matchups or hope 1 emerges. I'd be worried in 2nd league, all you have is Cooley.
Here's my draft in a 10 team yahoo money league (QB passing TDs only worth 4 pts - downgrades the value of QB relative to other positions). The overall pick is in parentheses. I used a similar vlaue approach based on Eric Karabell's player rankings:
1. (9) DeAngelo Williams RB +1
[I liked him better than Jackson, Mendenhall and Moss was gone]
2. (12) Miles Austin WR -4
[3rd rated WR]
3. (29) Beanie Wells RB +7
[I could have taken Moreno or McCoy here and might regret it]
4. (32) Greg Jennings WR +6
5. (49) Matt Forte RB +21
6. (52) Brent Celek TE -17
[I took the 4th TE knowing a run was coming, not seeing anyone else I liked at that pick and thinking I could get RB/WR value later]
7. (69) Jay Cutler QB -4
[It was either him or Kolb]
8. (72) Mike Wallace WR +18
9. (89) Clinton Portis RB +30
10. (92) Fred Jackson RB +14
11. (109) Eli Manning QB + 10
[In case Cutler + Martz don't work]
12. (112) Tim Hightower RB +27
13. (129) Dallas DEF -44
14. (132) Marshawn Lynch RB +29
15. (149) Bernard Berrian WR +84!!
16. (152) Ryan Longwell K
Notice that I have the Cardinals RBs locked up and I have the Bills big RBs (I don't think Spiller will be a workhorse back).
Ben - I think I talked to you about this one; but I love the Forte pick. Everybody seems so down on him...just because he underperformed last year. But last year he only was a bust because of how early he was getting drafted. He shouldn't have been the 5th pick last year - but if you could consistently get the #'s that he produced last year in the 3rd round of a draft this year, anybody would jump.
What do people think Chester Taylor will do this season?
@Ben O: Nice balanced draft. Your first 7 picks fill out the important 7 starting roster spots right away. I still may have waited on TE. In a 10 team league, you could probably grab Cooley and Zach Miller in the end. I like locking up both Ari RBs, and getting your backup QB early because of the Cutler risk. There will be weeks based on matchups where you start Eli I think.
@Patrick: Good question. I think Chester will have a similar role as he did in Minnesota. But it's confusing that Chicago is going with 2 pass-catching backs. It's not like Forte can't catch passes so they'll pull him on 3rd downs. They paid Chester a lot so they'll use him, but maybe more to spell Forte.
I think Chester Taylor will put up similar numbers to what he did last year in Minnesota, unless Forte gets injured. Chester's 30 and I think Forte is a much better back when healthy.
I think the upside with Forte is 1700 total yards (1100 rush 600 receiving) and 10-12 TDs. I think last year was the floor in terms of his performance.
Brett, I was debating taking someone other than Celek such as Crabtree or Harvin (and normally I would have), but I thought the difference between Celek and Zach Miller or Cooley and the fact that I wasn't likely to use that WR taken instead of Celek was too much for me not to take him.
Post a Comment